Blog

From fully managed EDI solutions to supply chain consulting.

Understanding EDI Standards: X12 vs. EDIFACT

Topics: EDI, EDI considerations, EDI options, EDI provider, EDI Technology

X12 vs EDIFACT by GraceBloodIn the world of electronic data interchange (EDI), two prominent standards have long dominated the landscape: X12 (US standard) and EDIFACT (European standard). Why should you care about this? In every EDI relationship, you’ll have to adhere to one of these standards. Both are widely used for facilitating the exchange of business documents electronically, streamlining processes, and enhancing efficiency across various industries. While they serve similar purposes, there are notable differences between the two EDI standards, each with its own set of advantages and applications.

X12: The American (US) Standard

X12, short for “ASC X12,” stands for Accredited Standards Committee X12, and it originated in the United States. It’s the predominant EDI standard used in North America, particularly in industries such as retail, healthcare, manufacturing, and transportation. The vast majority of GraceBlood’s projects are X12 standard based, but although this is a “standard” you’ll find a lot of variation within the “standard” once you add in XML and JSON…not to mention API, which we like to call “modern EDI.”  Simply stated, X12 defines a set of transaction sets or message types for different business processes, such as purchase orders, invoices, shipping notices, and payment advices.

Now, for all you techy folks, one of the key characteristics of X12 is its hierarchical structure, where data is organized into segments, elements, and composite data elements. Each segment represents a logical grouping of related data elements (i.e. item info, etc.), and the standard defines the sequence and format of these segments within a transaction set. X12 also allows for the use of both numeric and alphanumeric characters, providing flexibility in the way the data is represented. And although certain elements are meant for certain types of data, you’ll always find exceptions and those hipsters who try to sneak in non-standard types of data, frustrating EDI consultants everywhere.

EDIFACT: The Global Standard

The EDIFACT standard, which stands for Electronic Data Interchange For Administration, Commerce, and Transport, was developed by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/CEFACT). Unlike X12, which is primarily used in North America, the EDIFACT standard is widely adopted globally and is the standard of choice in many countries outside the United States, particularly in Europe and Asia. Although most of our clients are in North America and widely use X12, occasionally they might do business with European partners, bringing EDIFACT into the mix.

EDIFACT is known for its more compact and concise syntax compared to X12. It utilizes a delimited format, where data elements are separated by specific characters, making it easier to analyze and interpret. Additionally, the EDIFACT standard uses a message structure that consists of segments, data elements, and composites, similar to X12 but with some differences in terminology and syntax.

One of the strengths of EDIFACT lies in its flexibility and extensibility. It supports a wide range of business processes and industries, making it suitable for international trade and commerce. EDIFACT messages can also be customized and extended using user-defined segments and data elements, allowing organizations to tailor the standard to their specific requirements. In this way, it sounds more like XML than EDI.

Key Differences and Considerations

While both the X12 standard and the EDIFACT standard serve the purpose of facilitating EDI, there are several notable differences between the two standards:

  • Geographical Adoption: X12 is primarily used in North America, whereas EDIFACT is more widely adopted internationally.
  • Syntax: X12 uses a hierarchical structure with segments, elements, and composites, while EDIFACT employs a delimited format for data elements.
  • Flexibility: EDIFACT offers greater flexibility and extensibility, allowing for customization and adaptation to diverse business needs.
  • Industry Focus: X12 has strong roots in industries such as retail, healthcare, and transportation in the United States, while EDIFACT is commonly used in international trade and commerce.

In conclusion, the choice between X12 and EDIFACT often depends on factors such as geography, industry requirements, and interoperability with trading partners. To be transparent, it’s not usually a “choice” per se – it depends on what your customer is asking for and what they support. While each standard has its own strengths and characteristics, both play crucial roles in enabling seamless electronic communication in B2B transactions worldwide. Understanding the distinctions between X12 and EDIFACT is essential for organizations seeking to optimize their EDI platform and enhance efficiency in our global market.

One last thing – it’s important to verify that your EDI provider is proficient in both standards, as well as non-standard B2B processing like API and XML. The one thing that our development team will tell you is that every project is unique. There is no true standard when it comes to EDI.

Click here to download our latest whitepaper: The Impact of Predatory EDI Providers on SMBs

The Definitive Guide to EDI and Digital Transformation

This article was written by:

Related Posts

Contact GraceBlood—we’re here to help.